Comparison

Straumann BLX vs AnyRidge: immediate-loading implants compared

Both implants are marketed for immediate protocols. Here is what their US labeling actually says.

What actually differs

Labeling permits immediate function only when stability allows, for both.
Neither can guarantee same-day teeth.

Show only rows that differ

Feature	Straumann BLX	MegaGen AnyRidge
Labeling
Immediate function (US labeling)	Single-tooth, with good primary stability¹	Implants < Ø6.0 mm with good primary stability; larger implants delayed (2014 filing)²
Material	Ti-13Zr¹	CP titanium grade 4²

Highlighted rows differ. A design difference is not evidence that one implant gives better results for you. No scores and no winner. The choice is a clinical and restorative decision.

Clinical review pending. Facts on this page are checked against the sources listed below (regulatory records, manufacturer documents, peer-reviewed research). A named clinician will review it before we call it medically reviewed.
Last updated 28 Sep 2026 · How we review

Sources

Regulatory recordFDA 510(k) K173961 — Straumann BLX Implant System (510(k) summary) — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2018-06-05. Accessed 28 Sep 2026.
Regulatory recordFDA 510(k) K140091 — Xpeed AnyRidge Internal Implant System (MegaGen) — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2014-12-12. Accessed 28 Sep 2026.

Clinical assessment

Find out whether Straumann implant treatment suits you

Send a few details and, if you have one, a recent x-ray. A dentist from our clinical partner reviews your case and replies with next steps. Free and without obligation.

Request a clinical assessment

This website does not diagnose. Only an examination by a dentist can confirm a treatment plan.

Dentist explaining a panoramic x-ray to a couple